Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Such a simple thing can give much joy....

It's amazing how something so simple can add a bit of joy to a life...

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Universal Music Group can kiss my dollars goodbye!

While reading this link Red Hot Chili Peppers, QOTSA, T.I. Rock For Zune about the Zune launch, I came across this quote by UMG chairman/CEO Doug Morris.

"These devices are just repositories for stolen music, and they all know it," UMG chairman/CEO Doug Morris says. "So it's time to get paid for it."

Well Mr. Morris, I'm and iPod owner and now you can kiss my business away and not just from music, but from anything I can find out Universal Group is into, that includes DVD's, movies at the theatre, etc. Before you write me off, you might want to know that I own approximately 2000 CD's which I've bought over the years since 1985, I have about 200 DVD's, my son and I go to the movies almost every weekend, sometimes we'll even see two movies. We are the demographic your industry loves. But you can be sure that I will from now on not be contributing to your company or from any company that is part of your group or any artist that is part of your group.

You see Mr. Morris, you and your record industry might also be considered thieves, especially after all the lies you've told the consumer over the years. And lies you still tell, like those about iPod users.

I'm old enough and close enough to the music industry to remember all the industry's talk about CD's being cheaper to produce than vinyl, so that consumers should expect prices to come down. I remember many of the other lies your industry told. I remember paying $16 to $25 dollars per CD. I remember when your industry quit selling CD singles because they cut into the full album sales. I remember that your industry sold those singles for $3.99 each when a vinyl 45 or cassette single could be had for less than half that. Your industry used that to get rid of all singles sales. Leaving consumers to only buy full albums. I remember your industry lobbing for laws to make it illegal for someone to record songs off the radio for the own listening later.

I also know that your industry doesn't like people knowing how much your corporate profits went up dramatically from the 70's till now. You don't like people knowing about all the money you sucked from the coffers, the coffers which were filled by the boom of music in the 80's and 90's and brought along by MTV. You don't like the artists to know it and you don't like consumers to know it! And yet you call us thieves. You steal from your artist and from the consumer.

Capitalism allows all these things to happened, but when you call me a thief because I own an iPod, you've gone to far! That's liable to all the honest consumers of music. People stole music before the iPod came out and copied it to the early MP3 players. I did not own one of those, I waited till the iPod came out and I've bought songs from the Apple store. And I bought songs legally on iTunes.

You are upset now because your not making as big a profit as you want! You can't keep the growth factor going up much, you have competition from independent labels and the vast new sources of other music. Instead of being competitive with that, you call me a thief!

I can tell you this Mr. Morris. I will continue not to steal music, but you won't make any more money off me either. So your net result is that you'll still be losing money. Your arrogant Mr. Morris! You insult me and other honest consumers. Your customer service sucks Mr. Morris!

So now I won't steal the songs Mr. Morris, nor will I buy them. I'll record them off the radio as per my legal rights and then copy them to my iPod and still hear them in a legal way. Or better yet, I'll listen to other artists who are independent. You see Mr. Morris there is plenty of great music out there now. And it's in channels you don't control. That's the real thing that irks you and your industry!

I'll get the satisfaction of knowing that you Mr. Morris won't get a dime from me directly, I'll get the satisfaction that your big mouth has cause an artist to be a little ticked off with you because the won't get my dime either. Maybe just maybe those artists will move to a more progressive consumer friendly media giant or giants. Maybe they'll fire you after their contract is over with you. And then, maybe they will get more of there share of the vast profits that your industry has been getting since the advent of the CD. They'll get back what you and your industry has been stealing from them.

You and your industry can be considered thieves and thugs. You bully consumers and artist Mr. Morris! You do it both in the way you've marketed, scammed and played the system and now in your words and legal fights. You hate the biggest audience for your product, because they don't consume it in the way you want and others are empowering them to do so. It's called "freedom" Mr. Morris! Your industries monopoly on how, when and to whom product was delivered is over

The iPod and the revolution around it have forced your industry to wake up and have to be responsive to the consumer again. How have you responded to those consumers? Your threatening and suing children, teenagers and people who don't even have a computers. Your industry has put virus's on the consumers computers (and then said that destruction of a consumers property was not your fault - how two faced is that?). Your industry has colluded with radio in payola. The iPod and it's brethren has given back the option for consumers to buy the music they want to hear! The MP3 and iPod has given many other acts more distribution options things you don't like.

I have no problem with artist making profits from their songs and hard work! M vast collection of CD's will attest to that as I've paid for my music. But you know as well as I do that most artists make less than 5% of any song sold. You and your industry eat the other 95%. Your like the charity organizations that take in $1 and then give $0.10 cents to the needy and list the other $0.95 on the books as salaries, overhead, etc.

You tell me I'm a thief! Well you can kiss my a$$ goodbye Mr. Morris! You see, now I can listen to lots of artists who create great music and I can get to it because of the net, the iPod and the revolution that they brought about. I don't need you Mr. Morris! I'm no longer limited to what you and your group think I should buy. I can make sure the artists gets all the money.

Price fought for this and he was right. Artists take note!

With quotes like yours and others, we all see the greed and hatred you have for the consumer. We're just a profit number to you and if not that, then we're thieves. Your colors and your industry's colors are showing brightly Mr. Morris!

Here's hoping you are hit further by results of your disdain for the consumer. I hope that artists and consumers are further empowered by the revolution in media that is happening with iPods, video sites, more content creation by individuals and independent studios. Here's hoping they break you guys and make you realize the harm your doing to the very consumers you seem to want to sell too! To the artists and the consumers. It's a sad day when the middle-men get 95% of the profits and then alienate your very audience. Watch the company you keep... I hope new artists think twice before signing with a company that has a leader like you, a person who alienates a large part of the audience. Think twice and maybe three times...

As I was editing this post, I found this other blogger who shares some similar thoughts. Read it here: Universal Calls MP3 Users Thieves. In it I found out that Steve Balmer thinks I'm a thief also! Also, make sure you read the post referred too in here about Zune Pricing also. What a screw for the consumer! At least Apple is fair with it's users and tries to respect both parties. When you deal with the Microsoft and the music guys like Mr. Morris you always feel like your playing some kind of shell game and looking for how they are going to get one over on you. Good to see someone opened up that box. Lets just hope consumers get the information and don't fall for the shell-game.

Viva La iPod Revolution!

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Language syntax's, performance, PHP, Ruby, Java and who's better? Ahhhh!

I have a pretty interesting post on my O'Reilly blog about Ruby, Java, Lisp, PHP, performance and who's better.

You can read it here:

Language syntax's, performance, PHP, Ruby, Java and who's better? Ahhhh!

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Attributes of the "Best" programmers

Over on my O'Reilly blog I have response to another blog that I read the other day about what makes the "Best" programmers.

Here is the link:

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Home-schooling -- A Rant...

I read this article:
What are we teaching?

Anyway, I got frustrated with some replies (samples below) that some people who just wrote off home-schooling....

Schools are not what they used to be, as I remember them (and, as I'm sure you remember them), but neither are parents. And, it is true that as schools get smaller, they tend to get better. However, as they get "way" small, as in a home school environment, they do not necessarily get better. Trust me, all parents aren't teachers - some can barely be trusted as parents, ...

Posted by: Larry Morris | Aug 10, 2006 6:44:07 AM


Sandi - that's the nice thing about these blogs (and, indeed, this country), not only is everyone entitled to their own opinion, but simply having an opinion doesn’t make one right, ... (no matter how well researched it seems to be)

Posted by: Larry Morris | Aug 22, 2006 11:03:23 AM

Here's what I replied:

Larry et al,

Your quote: "Trust me, all parents aren't teachers - some can barely be trusted as parents, ..."

Some thoughts on that and your general attitude in the two posts that you've made to this article as I write this:

1) The barely trustable parents you mention isn't the set of parents that would bother asking the questions posed by the article!
2) Parents who can't be trusted generally wouldn't choose to homeschool as they most likely don't care much about their kids.
3) Many public school teachers are ill qualified as well and the teachers unions continue to fight all efforts to make the teachers accountable for their results. For example: Here in Texas they've fought having to show that they can pass the same test high school seniors have to pass to graduate.
4) Who decides which parents are worthy? You? Some government sponsored group like Child Protective Services? The legislature?
5) The statitics about H.S. dropouts are questionable at the low rates they say, but the schools and government reports have been shown to have been falsefied. The states and schools typically report 10% or less dropout rates and with No Child Left Behind it's been going lower as funding is tied to it. http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0303/p01s02-legn.html and http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0621/p03s02-ussc.html (Note: No one has even a 90% graduation rate)
6) Homeschooling parents have a much higher vested interest in the success of their children than anyone! No teacher, no government offical, no neighbor etc. has a higher vested interest!
7) Homeschoolers take on the responsibility for there kids success and still pay school taxes, etc.
8) Homeschoolers in most states still have to submit records for schooldistrict officals to monitor childrens progress
9) Homeschoolers in most states are required to show a education representative the curriculum
10) Saying that the parents aren't what they used to be is a fallacy. Parents are no worse than those 60's-70's parents whose kids where partaking of free-love and drugs.
11) Would you rather the government take care of all kids? Should the government be in full control of all off-spring and control each person?
12) Parents who homeschool now are doing nothing more than our forefathers and the founders of our country. They knew it was there responsibility to educate their kids. Not only that, the public education system wasn't set up to take away power or responsibility from parents, but to provide a better set of possibilites to all kids, to maximise the education oppertunities and to provide at least a minimal set of education to all kids.
13) Public school attendance wasn't mandatory in Texas till 1916 and even then private schools were allowed. Homeschoolers are private schools. It was much the same in other states as well. http://www.carwrecks.com/homeschool.html It wasn't until the 80's in Texas that the state education agency decided they knew better than the courts and parents who had choosen to home-school. Thankfully, the courts have sided not only with history but with the facts concerning home-schooling results.

Finally, as to having opinions and being "right". So far you don't give any facts to support your statements, just opinions. You mention not all parents are good, well neither are all kids nor are all people period. Should we as a society set up some group of people who say who is worthy? Or is that the Federal and State Education agency? Or maybe we just decide which people aren't worthy, smart enough, finacially prepared, well enough educated, etc., to have kids! Is it going to be Ivy League people who decide that, or maybe someone from the UN since they already propose crap like that? Larry et al., don't even take the time to educate themselves, may not even have kids and yet they feel like they can talk about something with which they know nothing. Just go on "feeling". To that point, "feelings" are not facts, and they lead to the old "If it feels good do it" attitude. And yet he feels compelled to tell those of us who've had our kids in public schools, and now educate them at home anything. He only shows ignorance to the facts, but also no interest in finding out the true, just the laxidazical attitude to write it off with edge-cases of "bad parents" and ill educated opinion. Truely ignorant of the facts of what home-schooling is.

Again from Larry: "having an opinion doesn’t make one right". Being ignorant to the facts doesn't make you right either, it just shows your ignorance to the facts. It's nice that you like that this country allows different opinions, but it also was built on self-sufficancy and responsibility. Be responsible yourself and educate yourself on the facts of home-schooling before criticizing others.


Sam Griffith Jr

Sunday, August 20, 2006

Proof that OS X Leopard will use ZFS? - Time Machine Revealed?

Also cross posted to my O'Reilly Blog at:

Over on SUN's ZFS web site, you'll find an interesting little article about ZFS snapshots.... (notice the screenshots) ;-)


I think you'll find it similiar enough to confirm that OS X Leopard will have ZFS as it's main file system. All I can say is "Awesome" Read more about ZFS to see why I'm so excited about OS X having the most advanced file system ever.

Since I took so long to write this several people beat me to the punch on posting. (I started it on 8-8-2006 and got sidetracked with some work things and didn't post it) The following is my favorite although I don't agree with the consclusions he comes too.:


And here are some more...
More about ZFS available at these links:

Screencasts of ZFS in action available from this page:

Friday, August 11, 2006

My thoughts on an significant person in my life. My High School Principal

Earlier this week the local newspaper "Community Impact" called to ask if they could use a quote from a petition I had participated in to name a new school in our area after my old principal. I of course said, "Yes!" It was time to acknowledge and pay-forward and pay back what I'd been given! I hopefully have repaid a little of what Mr. Rouse did for me as a student by helping to make sure he received this honor before he was not around to see or enjoy it. And most of all to thank him!

You see when I was in high school, I was in some advanced placement classes, football, debate, speech, Academic Decathlon, Gifted and Talented and various other areas of interest. I was also informally part of student council and many other groups and I could float around to any of the groups of other kids. It was a time when Leander High School was still small enough that you could know everyone's name... and I did. It's something I was proud of and that's related to another story about the head senior cheerleader (Jackie Schwartz) who greeted me the very first day of my freshman year... but back to Mr. Rouse.

The thing was I just wanted to do enough to get a "C". To pass if you will. I wanted to learn, but I didn't care if I got "A's" or not! What I did want to do, was to try as many things as I could! I even got to teach Physics my senior year, when I served as a teachers aid. (I enjoyed teaching greatly and that experience profoundly affected my future - but that too is another story). I even had the pleasure (to my great joy) of finally getting a letter jacket in the middle of my senior year. That happened when myself and two other "C" students on the Academic Decathlon team, won bronze medals while competing in the state competition. (Ours was the only school that year where no "A" students won a medal, only one "B" student won a medal and all our "C" students won... we went around talking about how we had the smartest "dumb" kids in the state for the rest of the year - something that you obviously can tell, I still find humor in) The question is though, "Why is any of this relevant?"

You see the outside world would see an 'under-achiever'. Mr. Rouse on the other-hand, knew me, knew my work, saw my achievements and saw past what others would consider untaped potential. I think he saw someone who was just inquisitive and didn't "yet" have a passion for any particular topic. I think he saw that I could learn anything and he had proof due to the many things I had done and the fact that I'd done them well enough to be able to be all over the map. I think he saw the untapped potential not as something to be frowned upon or to looked upon as being wasted, but as something that was still growing - as if the farmer hadn't decided which crops to finally settle on for the field. That field was my life, my passion and my future!

This all came into play when I wanted try to go to college, I was 106 out of a class of 156. Not a great position to be in. Back then you didn't get adjustments for having taken AP classes. A "C" was a "C".... and so my ranking was not so great. To be honest, at that time, I didn't really care! I was proud that I'd passed and I was also proud that I'd done so many other things. But when I did want to go to college, I needed to care. I couldn't get into most places because I had a 2.0 average and to be honest, I didn't know how to put onto paper, to write my thoughts about learning, my interests, etc. I didn't know what to say to a admissions board to convey the thoughts I had about learning and why I might be a good student to give a chance too. But I was lucky. When I did decide to try college, Mr. Rouse helped me!

I only applied one place and well, I wouldn't exactly call it applying. I called them to get directions and my dad drove me over and we walked in to the advisors office and asked to talk to someone about admissions. They only thing I had with me, was a letter that Mr. Rouse had written for me! And the sad fact is, I don't even remember what it said!

What I do remember is that my SAT scores (950 - fell asleep both times I took them - I was not serious about it at the time and it showed), my 2.0 average in high school, my still having no good direction or understanding of what I wanted to do and my general lack of a great passion or drive, my working at a bookstore part-time... none of that mattered.... what did matter, was the confidence that advisor placed in that letter and the words that Mr. Rouse had written about me! That mattered a lot!

Mr. Rouse saw the potential in me and in a few simple words transfered that belief in me through to the admissions person. That one little letter from a man like Mr. Rouse, meant more than those SAT scores, or anything else I might have done, but those words also had wrapped up his belief in me. Those words changed my life.

The school? Texas A&M

Now I didn't graduate from Texas A&M. My path took me down a different road, but I did go two years, at which point I left and came back to Austin Community College (ACC) - for which I came up with the catchy alternate name - Anybody Can Come!

While I was at Texas A&M, I was impacted by others, other students, the environment, the freedom, other things in life... growing... still not knowing what I wanted to do, but growing, still learning, still going to learn other things.... I audited a lot of other courses... ;-) But I also met quite a few other people who also steered my life... Scott Boyd, Greg Marriott, Andrew Donahoe, Jay Zabach and Darin Adler. They were either in Texas A&M graduate school or in the Macintosh Programmers special interest group in Austin. Three of them would later go on to be part of the core team of the Macintosh System 7 OS team. The others worked at MCC and other Austin high tech companies. I met them all because I went to Texas A&M!

If Mr. Rouse wouldn't have written the letter.... well, I'd probably never have met those people and never had been mentored by them. I wouldn't have been mentored on programming the Macintosh, running a business, artificial intelligence, and all kinds of other odds and ends in the technology area. I might not have learned that even people who don't finish college can work on and do great things!

Back in Austin and at ACC (I only went there 1 year), I did learn to program quite well, went into consulting and consulted for almost 10 years all over the US and Canada in advanced software design and techniques. I taught Java programming at SMU as adjunct professor, coauthored a programming book, had my own software company with 21 employees and mentored many people; both programmers and non-programmers; in lots of different things.

That belief and faith that Mr. Rouse; my old principal; had in me, did have an impact on my life and a quite significant one. An impact that neither Mr. Rouse, I, my parents nor any of those involved directly or peripherally at the time, could have known! It's funny how life pans out and it's also funny that that letter also provided one of life's other important lessons. It's not always what you know, but who you know and more than that, what they know about you! But that too is another story...

I'd still like to go finish my degree at Texas A&M one day... and have even entertained going while my son is going to college 10 years from now. I now know it's "OK" to just go to learn whatever your interested in. As much as I never thought that I was the kind of person who should just go to school to be a "well rounded" student. It's thru the growth and wisdom of life that I learned that becoming a well rounded educated person is what I was doing all along; just not by the standard formula... much like others who were looked over for not doing things the standard way. That's a great group by the way... Einstein, Newton, Ray Kroc, Picasso, Edison, Steve Jobs... not that I'm in their league, but there are minor similarities none the less.... and even if I'm a hanging onto the coat-tails of that group, it's a great group to be apart of.

All these things are due to belief from people like my parents, Mr. Rouse and others... People who saw the positive, had belief and wisdom. The wisdom to know that the harvest can't be known till you let the seeds grow....

Thanks to all and Mr. Rouse for watering that seed...

Gob Bless...

Friday, February 24, 2006

Test of the new OS X Blogger Widget

Glad to see Google is finally doing some real Mac stuff.....

Saturday, February 11, 2006

JBoss business model sucks???

My good friend Bill Dudney, had a few things bothering him concerning all the rumors about Oracle buying JBoss. While I agree with most of what he said, the parts about JBoss's business model are something I just can't agree with. Here's a link to what he had to say followed by my reply.

Bill Dudney's Weblog: ""

Here's my reply:

I guess I'm lost on why the JBoss business model is bad! Most open source only makes money by the people contributing to it doing consulting or training gigs. They never develop a brand around that solution space like JBoss did.

JBoss developed that brand, then to further strengthen the brand and the support possibilities for enterprises who wanted to 'one stop shop', they hired the people who contributed most. This gave those people many more possibilities than might be achievable otherwise. This action of hiring the most visible creators is plain simple business sense. Other industries do it all the time when someone comes up with a new way to do some engineering task, discovers a new chemical, creates a new invention, or even explains and talks about a particular topic better than someone else. Some big or small company or investor will come in and partner or buyout completely with the creators/originators. Thus the cycle of capitalism continues.

Now you many not like some of the lurking they did on TheServerSide, etc. and I agree, but they got nailed for that. Extreme marketing if you will. Not different from standard MS, IBM or others FUD tactics. But that does not make the business model bad or all the people who work for JBoss bad.

Even Richard Stallman himself is not against the big companies buying any company we might form and grow to a significant brand. He just wants to make sure that the community and mankind continue to get value from what that company got from the open source arena by mandating that that company (or individual) continue to give back improvements to the software tools themselves. This allows others to potentially build on those tools and possibly build services around them that have been overlooked or passed by, thus not orphaning any software tool or oppertunity itself b/c of some big company controling the full source. His ideas go back to the late 70's early 80's as you probably know already and were shaped by what happened in the Lisp AI lab at MIT and what happened there with Symbolics trying to lock up the intillectual property created by him and others. Symbolics did this by licensing what had formerly been free.

JBoss doesn't lock anyone out. You and I can get in there all day long and use it, modify it, market it ourselves, even form our own company to compete against JBoss Inc. and even if we wanted to hire away the talent from them. But per Stallman's ideas and the ideas of OS, the software and improvements to it are still free to all.

OS isn't about getting rid of big companies who can buy or own the source of the ideas (us humans). It is about letting everyone have access to those ideas and implementations so that we can gain power from them too! The marketing and business that can grow around and build on that are "Capitalism" at its finest. And in the end, the win is bigger! Even if JBoss gets bought, the software is still free and you, I or any other person or business could pick right up where they left off. Having an independent company providing great support for a great tool. Who knows, maybe Oracle or someone else would want to buy that company (us) too....

In the end, JBoss is the only open source app server that the big enterprise customers see as competition to WebSphere and BEA. I see that all the time when working with companies. (Note: Even though I'm a author of a book about JBoss, I don't get to set the server choices of those companies I'm talking about)

The people who took it further, hired the people to give them even more time to contribute and build on that toolset, have further shaped the industry, pushed SUN, IBM, MS and others to take OS more seriously and given us as developers a bigger idea of what is possible.

Should we be mad and disparage them because they took the ideas of capitalism and applied them to something free....!!! I think not! JBoss still continues to give back. The developers of the tools incorperated into JBoss still give back.... Maybe JBoss didn't hire everyone who contributed... but so what.... they hired some! Maybe those who contributed most, I don't know, but some people are getting the chance to do what they love full time and potentially make a lot of money for it.

In the end if you are upset about giving software away and seeing someone else figure out how to make more money off of it than you did, then you've missed out on what Stallman and others have been preaching.

Open Source is not Utopia! Open Source is not Communism for software either. It is the best of the American dream, the Golden Rule and other such ideas at multiple levels. We all get to see the shared output, contribute, receive and have the opportunities to build on that to achieve our dreams!

It's what we do with the tools and opportunities to reach those dreams that counts! JBoss just happens to be a group of people who made that dream come true with some software that is free.... Bad? I think not....

3 Cheers for Capitalism....